Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 23:56
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Kyle Busch, Josh Berry go sliding in practice at Nashville - NASCAR.com
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
June 21 Is Suddenly a Big Day for Borderlands 4 - Game Rant
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
This couple paid $19M for 2 Jersey Shore houses. Then they demolished them. - NJ.com
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Early Humans Did More Than Just Walk—They Mastered a Surprising Skill Set - Indian Defence Review
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What are Best Breakfast Places in Pune?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Can you explain the difference between an ego, soul, mind, and consciousness?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
SEC Raises Legal Questions Over Proposed Ethereum, Solana ETFs - Decrypt